Is Microsoft Still Relevant? How?

October 30, 2006 – 2:54 am by coachwei | Category Main Page, google |

Back four years ago (2002), a good friend who works at Microsoft told me confidentially that Microsoft is working on something called “XAML”. “Very similar to Nexaweb - watch out”, he said. To the contrary, I was actually thrilled. Regardless of what it means from a competitive perspective, XAML validates the declarative programming approach that Nexaweb has been championing for many years. A declarative programming model separates logic from presentation, enabling developers to use a declarative syntax (XML for example) to describe presentation (much similar to how a system administrator would use a configuration file to configure a system) while using a programming language like Java and C# for logic.

So I waited…from Avalon to Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) to Windows Presentation Foundation Everywhere (WPF/E),  from Indigo to Windows Communication Foundation, from the fanfare of a new file system to the decision of dropping the new file system, …eventually all under the umbrella of Windows Vista. I installed the initial preview of “Longhorn” on a heavy duty desktop in 2003, built a few apps on it. Over the next few years, I installed quite a few follow-on releases and read a lot about Longhorn from press and Microsoft blogs.  While I am still sort of waiting for the release, I just realize that I don’t really care about when/whether Windows Vista is released anymore.

The realization came from reading an observation made by Atroon from TechRepublic recently:

I was discussing this with a friend the other day, and we noticed a pattern in Microsoft's software. All of it was launched with great hype and fanfare and touted as a 'good' product, but the results have been mixed. Going all the way back to 1986:

DOS 3.3: GOOD
DOS 4.2: BAD
DOS 5.0: GOOD
DOS 6.0: BAD
DOS 6.22: GOOD
Windows 3.0: BAD
Windows 3.1: GOOD
Windows 95: BAD
Windows NT/98: GOOD
Windows ME: BAD
Windows 2000/XP: GOOD
Windows Vista: ?

While I certainly enjoyed the humor in Atroon’s logic, the post caught my attention because I just realized that I have not paid attention to Windows Vista for a long time!  This realization makes me wonder:

Is Microsoft Still relevant?

There is no doubt that Microsoft is and will continue to be the leading software company in the world. There is no doubt that Windows dominates and will continue to dominate computer operating system. Microsoft Office is and will continue to be the productivity suite for information workers…In every sense, Microsoft is relevant and strong as ever. So what happened?

The world has changed. The traditional desktop-centric world that Microsoft dominates and thus commands everyone’s attention has been replaced by an Internet-centric world that Microsoft is less relevant. Who is the company that commands everyone’s attention in this new world? It is Google.

In retrospect, I am amazed by how much attention I have given to Google myself over the last two years:

  •  I became a Gmail user early 2004, despite that I really did not need another web email account;
  • I am probably one of the first developers to download GWT and built an application on it following its 2006 JavaOne announcement. My opinion? GWT  is naively crafted and will never become a real product. If GWT is developed by another company other than Google, it would never have received any attention. I asked some very well known people about GWT and their reaction is “GWT is one of Google’s recruiting tool”.
  • I rushed to sign up for Google Spreadsheet when it became available early this year (was it alpha initially)
  • Again, I rushed to Google Docs & Spreadsheet the moment that it was announced;

Of course, like everybody else, I spent an insane amount of time reading about Google/Writerly acquisition, Google/DodgeBall acquisition, Google/YouTube acquisition, Google/MySpace deal … It is funny that the website of a tube and roll form equipment Company’s website, www.utube.com, was brought down due by heavy traffic when Google/YouTube deal was announced.

Is Microsoft still relevant? Yes, it is relevant in many ways. However, I think the most “relevant” way is that “Microsoft” is probably the best phrase to characterize Google today. In this new age, Google is the Microsoft.

  1. 9 Responses to “Is Microsoft Still Relevant? How?”

  2. On GWT, I can not agree more with you. It is not a serios tool for UI development.

    By <a href="http://www.vertexlogic.com"> Anil Sharma </a> on Oct 30, 2006

  3. Hype doesn't equal relevance. Sure Google has done lots of things of the last few years. But what beyond the search engine is all that useful or even their own internally developed products. They bought writely, Google video was a floundering and bought YouTube, never even heard of DodgeBall. Sure, I can add a word of a day widget to my Google homepage but, how cares.
    Microsoft has and will always deliver more value to the developer than anyone else and when you win the minds of the developer you are as relevant as any search engine, with some toys. Call it maturity, Microsoft doesn’t need to release toys a couple kids are going to use; they need to build real value for their customers. This is something that Google doesn’t need to do, if you don’t make any money from Adwords so what, there are a million other sites generating money for Google (The long tail).

    By Anonymous on Oct 30, 2006

  4. Yep I second that. Microsoft is certanily not playing in the field for the techsavy fun boys. Internet Explorer is still far more advanced than firefox. Even IE 5.0 is still much better than firefox 2.0. IE is stable and in most of the time predictable. We have been working on a very complex framework, and gecko engine is just not cool at all. I am not talking about web browsing exprience, I am talking about pure DOM programming. I have to admit without microsoft it would have been a jungle out there with non-sensical, not-updated, half-finished, half-supported products. If you ask me, Yes Microsoft is relevant and will stay that way for a long time. I dont even go there to compare a web seach company, namely Google, to Microsoft.

    By Anonymous on Oct 31, 2006

  5. Google is becoming the new Microsoft from an impact and influence perspective. I don't think the author is comparing Googl and Microsoft on any other aspects…

    By Chris Sport on Oct 31, 2006

  6. Google is definitely coming up with innovative products these days, but do you honestly think that they have any real intention of taking down excel and word? I don’t. Google spreadsheet and whatever the next thing that Google Labs invents will be just another cool toy for Google to put ads on.
    I don’t think Google is the Microsoft of the new age and I don’t they want to be.

    By Anonymous on Oct 31, 2006

  7. Oh, i actually do think Google is becoming the next Microsoft, though they may not intend to be. The forceof capitalism, trajectory of corporate growth, as well as the reality are all clearly showing where Google is heading towards. I'll try to write another post to elaborate more on this.

    By Coach Wei on Oct 31, 2006

  8. Im sorry but IE 5 or even IE 6 are not more advanced than firefox. For pure DOM programming, how can you say that a non standards compliant browser has the upper hand?
    Good things that Microsoft has done:
    -Windows 2000
    -.NET framework and c# language
    IE is horrible

    By Anonymous on Nov 2, 2006

  9. >Microsoft is certanily not playing in the field for the techsavy fun boys

    By Anonymous on Nov 4, 2006

  10. Do you believe that Google is working on an OS? They certainly have the brain power and money to build one. I think at this point, with all of their power, they would be foolish NOT to build an OS.

    By Anonymous on Dec 12, 2006

Post a Comment